A novel written in the first person is a first-hand account of events told or narrated through the eyes of a single character, usually the main character. Books written in the first person are easily identified by the use of the pronoun “I” instead of “he or she.”
In my opinion, having a first person write a novel can be effective depending on the type of story it is, it allows readers to sympathize with the character’s feelings and thoughts and see their perspective on life in the story, albeit in the first person. it doesn’t directly tell the readers what other people are feeling, except by making them perform certain actions that the speaking character will later act out.
The reader will see phrases like “I said, I thought,” rather than “he said, she thought.” Everything is experienced through the eyes of a single character, and all thoughts and observations are confined to that person. There can be no outside observer. If the narrator doesn’t see or experience an event firsthand, they can’t be part of the story. All the scenes in the story are filtered through the unique perception of this person.
One of the advantages of the first person makes the narrator up close and personal. The reader can identify with the character and experience his deepest and most intimate thoughts and feelings. While the third person and omniscient points of view distance the reader, the first person allows him to enter the narrator’s world, aware of his personal thoughts and feelings.
One of the disadvantages of writing in the first person is that the author is restricted to a single point of view. The first person is the narrowest and most restrictive point of view because everything is seen and processed through the mind of the narrator.
Some authors find first person a natural choice, while others find it too limiting to stick to one character’s point of view throughout an entire book. Some find writing in the first person as easy and comfortable as writing in a personal journal, others find it awkward and restrictive.
Another advantage of writing in the first person is that it gives a more personal feel and gives you a sense of directness that other narrative styles lack.
You can get away with things while writing in the first person that would not be possible in any other style. Mistakes are more acceptable, or variations of writing, especially if you were journaling for a young teen with dyslexia, for example.
It’s much easier to inject personality and emotion through first-person style, since you’re writing as that person unless you’re writing as an emotional psychopath, which probably wouldn’t be a good idea if you want someone to identify with him. to them.
It’s more acceptable to write down your character’s thoughts since you are them. This can be more difficult to do in the third person; it might even cause your writing to lose its flow. You can weave flashbacks, memories, and thought waves into your writing, in a more natural way.
As such, it can be easier to develop a character this way and really get to know them (more personal), as opposed to writing in the third person, where you can easily be more distant. This can be useful in long and short stories. Mentioning short stories, using the first person in one of them can give you a more emotional and intense explosion than the third person.
As a narrator, you can not only tell a story and reveal emotions and things like that, but you can also lie directly. This can make for an extremely interesting story and exciting character. This can produce surprising effects, especially when the lie is ridiculously obvious, adding a lot of color to a story.
This style is immediate, giving us a first-hand experience of the events. We are led to believe these events as we only have that one person to base our understanding on, rather than a multitude of characters. This makes the story more focused as it is from a direct point of view.
It is often perceived as more difficult to write in the first person than in the third person, and gives the perspective of a character’s world view. As said before, you don’t know everything and you can’t delve into the minds of other characters, unless you’re writing as more than one person. This means there is little room to see another character’s perspective. And this can lead to bias and an unreliable account.
One of the problems with writing in the first person is that “I” gets used too much, and this lack of variation can make a piece feel overwhelming and dry and an image not painted correctly.
Due to the limited perspective, the narrator can only say things that he sees and hears. They can’t know anything for sure except what they see firsthand, so the character must take an active part in the story if he is to be a reliable narrator.
Possibly one of the most important disadvantages of writing in the first person is that it depends on the speaking and/or writing ability of the narrators/characters.
Lastly, due to the narrow vision and not being able to see the minds and reactions of other characters, they can never figure out how other people really see the narrator. They only have the word of the narrator and they could well be lying.
Writing in the first person is good when you want to leave your readers in the dark, providing tension because this limits their point of view, which is a good source of not really knowing what might happen next.
The reader of the inner voice point of view knows exactly what the main character thinks, sees, feels and hears: all the senses and thoughts of the main character’s body and mind through this point of view.
However, writing in the first person provides such a limited point of view that it does not allow the writer to ‘develop’ any other character beyond what the ‘I’ sees or thinks of others.
Also the Motive is limited to ‘I’ and there are no real motives stated for anyone else, except what the character ‘I’ expresses and/or thinks, which is (or should be) somewhat suspicious: the ‘I’ could be wrong and cheated.
Another disadvantage is that nothing happens beyond what the character chosen for this point of view knows or learns.
Some people prefer to read novels in the third person because it allows them to read in an omniscient frame of mind, it is also a good way to show conflict, conflict is most of the story when the point of view allows the writer to show even differences slight but significant. more easily
There are more options and fewer restrictions by writing in the third person instead of the first person because the options increase so much in action and reaction.
Some people believe that the first point of view is certainly the most natural voice to use.
I think it is the naturalness of writing in the first person point of view that accounts for the fact that most first-time novelists choose it.
I think writing in the first person allows the reader to get into the minds of the characters and see the point of view of the characters, which can be bad or good, depending on whether the intentions of the characters are good or bad.
When the first person narrates the story, I think the readers feel more personally connected to the character because they are told the story as if they were their friends or treated as witnesses, especially in conflict, drama or crime scenes.
However, if you want readers to feel more detached from your characters, writing in the third person is better than the first person, then they will read without feeling anything for the characters and it gives them less of an identity.
Like omniscient and first-person narrators, the limited third-person narrator allows the reader access to the main character’s thoughts. Unlike the omniscient narrator, however, the limited third-person narrator can only convey a character’s perspective to the reader. In this way, the limited third-person narrator is like the first-person narrator: the point of view recreates how an individual experiences the world.
I personally like to read novels with a first person point of view, for example I read three of the best teen vampire thrillers by Stephanie Meyer, Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse and I have yet to read Breaking Dawn, they all have the first person. Point of View, Stephanie Meyers makes the character of Belle really engage readers by expressing her deepest thoughts and feelings in an intense and dramatic way that makes readers not want to put the book down.
I also like to read third person POV in some novels like romantic comedies, thrillers, etc. but reading in the first person POV makes me feel closer to the character and gives him more respect for himself, I think, than the author narrating in the third person.
Observing the character following you through a first person POV journey is more special than reading a third person POV novel, although it can be restrictive, reading through a first person POV can create another world or state of mind for the explore reader.
In general, there are many advantages and disadvantages to reading in a first person point of view, but at the end of the day it is up to the reader which point of view they prefer, whether it is the first person point of view, the omniscient point of view or the general point of view. third person point of view. Point of view that they enjoy reading, it also depends on the type of novel it is, different points of view can be represented depending on the narrative or the theme of the novel, for example, if it is a novel about a group of young teenagers who go on a journey, this may be written by the author’s third-person POV, or if the novel is about a main character and his friends, the author may write in first-person POV, making the character the narrator. So I think it depends on the individual reader which point of view they prefer to read from.